GHCN & NCDC data not trustworthy.
c3headlines.typepad.com
c3headlines.typepad.com
c3headlines.com
....
What can accurately be inferred from the chart is that Brisbane experienced "unequivocal global warming" only after climate scientists unequivocally adjusted up the original (RAW) temperatures of the late 20th century, and unequivocally adjusted down the temperatures in the early 20th century.
This is just not an isolated case, but the tip of the proverbial iceberg. As more are discovering, temperatures across the world have been methodically "adjusted" in the same manner to create or enhance the warming of the temperature record. Recent examples of discovered manipulation of the temperature database include: China; Darwin, Australia; Nashville, USA; New Zealand; Siberia, Russia; the Nordic countries; Alaska, USA; Switzerland; New York City, USA; California, USA.
How much global warming has occurred in during the post-1970s? Based on this new evidence, it appears not very much. And most importantly, the claimed warming by alarmists is not "unequivocal," instead it's a fabrication.
Additional articles on subject of temperature adjustments/fabrication:
An update: How Siberia was made hotter and the attempt to suppress truth
An Update: Concerning Darwin, Australia Temp Adjustments
A Warming Bias in the U.S. Temperature Record???
The Warm Bias In The CRU Data
Why We Need a New Global Data Set
‘Stimulating’ Scientists Into Proving Global Warming
United States and Global Data Integrity Issues
NOAA August and Summer Numbers Again Not Jiving with Satellite Data
Is the earth getting warmer, or cooler? A tale of two thermometers
Is NASA’s Hansen Playing Enron Accounting Games With Climate Data? |
