SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Brokerage-Chat Site Securities Fraud: A Lawsuit

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (1561)7/11/2003 1:34:51 PM
From: CountofMoneyCristo   of 3143
 
Incidentally, to clarify, I have not just gone out completely on a limb recently, and have been discussing the case with a number of prominent firms that I believe are worthy of faith. Not all attorneys are the same as those I unfortunately dealt with previously.

So, I may make the decision to hire a trial lawyer when this case reaches trial. I do know that it is far more effective to have a lawyer pleading your case for you at trial than trying to do it yourself. But, that's a ways off. A trial would not take place for at least another 8-12 months, if not longer, depending on how long the appellate process takes, which I understand could be a long time, unfortunately. I've done my part to speed that up by filing my first brief a week early, not requesting a 60-day extension for time to file it as is each party's right.

What may very well happen soon is that a class action is filed. In all likelihood, attorneys would be representing the class. I would opt out, and certainly not be lead plaintiff in that action.

As for what happened before with my attorneys, well I am sure the defendants are eager to use that, to bring it up and say, "See, he blames everyone, even his own attorneys!" If they do, then they will open the door wide open to admission of facts and proceedings that normally are barred from being presented, such as statements they made before trial, and their motions seeking to avoid coming in front of the jury. For that reason, I would be surprised if they did try to argue the above. It would be a net-loss argument.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext