SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC )

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zeuspaul who wrote (1544)6/26/1998 3:10:00 PM
From: Dave Hanson  Read Replies (2) of 14778
 
Sorry if I've asked this before, but what apps will typically be loaded on this machine at once?

Keep in mind that a faster processor may not appreciably cut times of 100% CPU utilitzation, depending on what's causing that utilization. Full blown use of serial ports, for instance, can bring any speed of processor to full use if the app doesn't use it efficiently.

Perhaps you'd notice a difference between PII 233 and, say 300 mhz performance, but I very much doubt it would be significant.

Perhaps a good compromise would be 128 megs and 266 PII, since the 266 is now within $30 of the 233, and offers a better jump than the one to 300 anyway (keeping in mind that all 3 are the same silicon to begin with.)

"My guess is that a PII 333 with 64 MB RAM is faster than a PII 233 with 128 MB RAM for many web surfing and some trading machine tasks."

You may be right. Still, the difference in RAM pricing is <$75, whereas the processor difference is more like $250. Don't know how much of a concern this might be though.

Were it me, I think I'd go for the RAM, but there are certainly good arguments both ways.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext