SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 217.25+0.6%11:41 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: KeithDust2000 who wrote (156674)4/17/2005 11:55:55 PM
From: pgerassiRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
Dear Keith:

I did not makeup all sorts of nonsense. You are the one who wants to compare Xeon 3.6GHz to Opteron 252. It loses in comparable boxes from the same manufacturer. If you want to use some proprietory chipset then why not compare them with say Nforce4 Pro (2250/2200) chips on a MB (a 2 way 275 can attach 4 of them), Horus or Cray's Red Storm approach.

Throwing external hardware and money is easy. To get less than 10% more TPCm, they threw at it some 3 times more costly storage. I'm sure that with the same cost, the Opteron box would have done much better. Sure if money was no object, I could attach enough SSD to totally blow the Hurricane based 141K TPCm right out of the water at 100 $/TPCm, but what does that prove? 2 275s is a 2S system on a MB with NF4 Pro 2250/(3)2200s or perhaps 4 875s in a Sun V40z server with 6 PCI-X slots should make mincemeat out of a 2S or 4S Hurricane board given roughly equal storage systems using less electrical power.

Kudos to IBM for getting Hurricane out but, price/performance competitive it is not.

Pete
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext