SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Dividend investing for retirement

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Woody_Nickels who wrote (15898)6/1/2013 1:17:28 AM
From: Elroy1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 34328
 
Your hypothesis
depends on the REIT earning more than
the pf shares cost. Not always true.


Yup, it's not always true, but it has been for the past few years. I wasn't paying attention to mREITs when they weren't earning more than pfd shares cost. When was that?

Most of them have only been around for 2-5 years. NLY is I guess the oldie.

More shares divided into constant income
means less all around.


The income isn't constant. If the mREIT raises money with preferred shares it has a larger capital base, and thus larger income. As long as the capital raised by the preferred issuance earns more than the preferred coupon, there will be MORE money for the common shares. If the preferred costs 8% per year, but the mREIT is able to earn 12% via leverage of it's capital base, the extra 4% goes to the common without any increase in the number of common shares.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext