SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (16045)11/23/2005 4:48:00 PM
From: Sully-   of 35834
 
Update to: The war they believe in (the post I'm linking to)

Via Power Line

UPDATE: Readers Malcolm Jones and John Steele add a more basic point. Jones writes:
    How is a non-link to 9/11 significant? The President 
never made such a link claim!!!
    I suspect the Daily Brief was a snap-shot/preliminary 
assessment of possible/known ties between Al Qaeda and
Hussein. Even if a non-link verdict exists; it doesn't
undermine the case for war.
John Steele writes:
    I guess I missed something. So the left is now claiming 
that contemporary intel documents say there was no proof
of a link between Saddam and the 9/11 attacks. So what,
the President didn't say there was. The elephantine
efforts of the left have managed to prove that that there
was no justification for what the President didn't claim.
    Wow, stop the presses. 
See also Victor Davis Hanson's NRO column: "The crying game."

nationalreview.com

powerlineblog.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext