>>So, Andy and BaldEagle, I hope I made my point a little clearer this time around. I am only trying to compare AMZN to TSIG from an overview of their respective masterplans... and, IMHO, in the long-term I strongly believe our gameplan will win.<<
Perhaps. I certainly hope you are right. The problem is that TSIG still has to prove its business plan, where as AMZN has proved its success as far as the market is concerned, even though it is not making money at this point. And it has tremendous market share.
>>The bottomline is all that counts.<<
For most investors the bottom line is the stock price. Again here AMZN has proved itself and we are hoping TSIG will prove itself.
>>With no specific companies in mind, but only as an analogy, would you prefer owning a company that did $800,000,000. in gross business, but showed a bottomline loss of $100,000,000.... or would you prefer owning a company that only did $300,000,000 in gross business, but had a bottomline net profit of $100,000,000? <<
When TSIG has a bottom line net profit of 100M, I will consider this a valid and relevant argument.
I agree that ultimately TSIG's business plan may be superior to Amazon's. However, it remains for them to demonstrate that they can execute this plan and make large profits. I believe they have a good shot and I am very long. But I am not convinced it is a sure thing.
Andy,
being right
and sitting tight.
>>>ggg<<<
|
