SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Alighieri who wrote (160979)2/14/2003 3:05:34 PM
From: hmaly   of 1575984
 
Al Re...You may want to address us as if we were born yesterday...but that is again rather insulting. This is a political war. One aimed at protecting America's "honor" and the 2004 election.

LOL What are you trying to say here. That even if Saddam disarmed completely, that the US had no intention of letting Saddam off the hook. Well, if you guys are so smart, why didn't Saddam comply and call GW's bluff. Right now, you can't say GW didn't go to the UN and try to get a resolution backing war; because simply put, GW did get resolution 1441, and Saddam is still in non- compliance. So not only did Gw cover his butt in 2004, it is you soft on terrorism liberals, who look out of tune with the American public. If your European liberal friends knew Gw wasn't going to comply,and had no intention of voting for enforcing 1441, back in Nov.,then they shouldn't have pretended they backed 1441, by voting unanimously for it in the security council. Their duplicitous games have caused a lot more problems than they solved.

GW has failed the country and the world. Americans and Iraqis will die by the thousands as a result of his failure.

You can say that, but GW did give Saddam every chance he possibly could. If Saddam is too stupid to believe it, then that is his problem.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext