Al Re...You may want to address us as if we were born yesterday...but that is again rather insulting. This is a political war. One aimed at protecting America's "honor" and the 2004 election.
LOL What are you trying to say here. That even if Saddam disarmed completely, that the US had no intention of letting Saddam off the hook. Well, if you guys are so smart, why didn't Saddam comply and call GW's bluff. Right now, you can't say GW didn't go to the UN and try to get a resolution backing war; because simply put, GW did get resolution 1441, and Saddam is still in non- compliance. So not only did Gw cover his butt in 2004, it is you soft on terrorism liberals, who look out of tune with the American public. If your European liberal friends knew Gw wasn't going to comply,and had no intention of voting for enforcing 1441, back in Nov.,then they shouldn't have pretended they backed 1441, by voting unanimously for it in the security council. Their duplicitous games have caused a lot more problems than they solved.
GW has failed the country and the world. Americans and Iraqis will die by the thousands as a result of his failure.
You can say that, but GW did give Saddam every chance he possibly could. If Saddam is too stupid to believe it, then that is his problem. |