Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tejek who wrote (161354)	2/17/2003 9:40:17 PM
From: hmaly	of 1575961

Ted Re..Now I understand yours and Ray's and Bush's thinking. Its based on the concept of how we dealt with communism. It was costly, but effective. It cost us 35,000 men to save 40 million in SK, yet today, it would be impossible to fight that long of a war, without major rioting. don't think its going to work this way this time. ted I didn't know you was a military genius, who knew better than the brass how to defeat terrorism. Why not send them a letter. Divide and conquer has always been the objective throughout the centuries. Why would it be any different now. The second rule is to try and fight on the enemies territory, which the US has been especially good at lately. Defense, such as trenches have been outmoded since WWI. Patten, the greatest general in US history, was an offensive genius. The only war we lost was Vietnam, a war designed by the generals, to be defensive, not offensive.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next