SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 40.26-0.2%12:18 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: wanna_bmw who wrote (162713)3/21/2002 2:51:32 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
WBMW, AMD can go with higher-associative caches because they typically run their processors at lower clock speeds than Intel. In other words, it's easier for them to increase the associativity, at least when you look at the problem from this angle alone.

Don't worry about what the 'Droids will claim. When they see favorable results for AMD's processors, they'll point to some well-marketed feature and claim, "That's the reason!" It doesn't matter whether that feature actually has any effect or not, because the truth takes a back seat to their need to believe fantasies.

By the way, if you want to battle armchair experts, it might help to get minor facts straight. An 8 KB fully associative cache will not have 8192 ways, unless you think the size of each cacheline is one byte. ;-)

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext