Range Bound & Undervalued Quality Stocks Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Range Bound & Undervalued Quality Stocks

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jane4IceCream who wrote (1636)	3/30/2000 6:51:00 AM
From: the-half-wit	of 5499

> Kind of odd why WITC doesnt come close to CMGI in share > price based on mentioned stats. Guess it goes back to > the internet proverb...."first to market first to soar > in share price." cmgi and witc are completely different ====================================== cmgi hasn't beaten witc to market in any way. cmgi and witc don't compete, they are in very different businesses and are at very different stages. (actually, iirc, cmgi owns a bunch of witc stock.) cmgi and witc are similar ========================= the similarity i see between witc and cmgi is to do with a broad view i take of their respective strategies and growth prospects. cmgi grew by acting as a sort of venture fund for a variety of early stage internet marketing related ventures. witc is also acting as a sort of fund, but their targets aren't restricted to marketing related ventures, and their form of participation (as an investment banker) is arguably even more profitable than cmgi's. i see no reason why wit capital won't manage the sort of growth that cmgi has managed (about 10,000% since 97), and i expect analysts to begin to see that quite soon.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next