Far from a myth koan, the Custodian of Absentee Property is official zionist law ... check it out, you won't find anyone credible denying it ... this is the 'legal' mechanism they use to take the property of people, not all of whom were 'absent' by the way, leading to the interesting concept of 'present absentees' who get robbed just the same - google.ca
So much stuff in your post here that is completely untrue, where to start ... well, how about realising that the problem is zionism, not 'jews', these are two distinct concepts, not all zionists are jews, and not all jews are zionists, by a long shot
No, Palestine was not a 'land without a people', the zionist who said that [Zangwill?] had never been there, later did visit, and repudiated the statement ... estimates vary but there were at least hundreds of thousands of people there when the first Rothschild colonies started, and the great majority of them arabic speakers ... yes there were twenty thousand or so jews in Jerusalem, forming a majority of that town's population at the time, you might consider noting that these jews were strongly opposed to zionism [as is my jewish neighbour down the road], they could see what trouble it would bring ... this community had been invited in by the first ottoman ruler, Suleiman something, if memory serves
Yes the zionists had european capital, technology, and organisation, they did develop places they colonised, the problem lies in how these places were taken in the first place, and the overall effect on inhabitants ... the first colonies caused less trouble than later ones, in fact were welcomed and got along quite well, however post-1917 the pressure of zionist inflow became much greater which understandably threatened indigenous people - intentions of the movement were clear and soon became known among the locals ... this is where the current situation 'started', not in the 40s, though 1948 does bring one of the major periods of dispossession
The brits abandoned the indigenous to the zionists in '48, as much or more than the other way round ... they just left, period
In 1967 it was the zionists who attacked the egyptians, check it out, morning surprise strike on their air force ... same in '56, surprise invasion to capture the canal ... same in '48 - almost all casualties on both sides occurred outside the zionist parts of that 'partition' ... it was '73 when the arabs started the shooting, in that case egyptians were advancing into occupied egyptian territory, syrians advancing into occupied syrian territory
You really don't know a hell of a lot about the history of this thing, chuck, your posts make that clear ... and you certainly don't look at it from an objective viewpoint, you've bought some Hollywood propaganda version .... there is plenty available on the net - particularly interesting imho are various documented statements by zionists that correct all the misconceptions you just posted ... you can find some names here [and do note that the only jew in the cabinet at the time of the Balfour declaration was strongly anti-zionist] - en.wikipedia.org
Will PMs rise in price over this 'crisis', probably yes, but i maintain it won't do us near as much good as will less bloodthirsty reasons, like air coming out of fiat currencies through competitive devaluation and debt pressures .... base metals may or may not be vulnerable on the downside, generally i think military spending does not help them, especially zinc, as they don't galvanise shells and bombs and aeroplanes much ... if sphincters get sufficiently tightened we'll see selling in a lot of our plays, particularly those in the Chaostans which comprise most of the planet outside the Americas .... later ... cheers |
