lance - uh, OK:
To: LANCE B
From: Jacalyn Deaner
Tuesday, Jun 29 1999 11:11PM ET
Lance,m I did go to Tom at the very beginning and asked him for the correct numbers,
he said they ARE CORRECT and for me to "get lost" in other words, I was bugging
him. That to me is not a good way to get validation and verification. He gave me more
wrong numbers and names and when I asked him about it, he told me to mind my own
business.
What DUH? I gave him plenty of time to answer up and prove up or just explain that
he was NOT INTERESTED instead he denied any part. WRONG ANSWER on his
part.
I will not apologize to him nor rumball - when I asked politely for 2 weeks for help,
and it is all evidenced in my posts on their threads wherever they HID and changed
their names but I was able to track them down - they told me to "@#@$ off". particularly
tom (rumball was easy to find because he started the thread)
regardless, that is where I stand and why I stand in my position, $hit on me once shame
on you $hit on me twice shame on me. I don't care about a particular person's trading
technique nor skill, we are all in the market to make money and get "the big one" - I
however, don't make $hitting on people a preferred means to my end.
Good luck and good bye, Jacalyn
A person is known by the company he or she keeps - that is the mirror you should be
looking into. I like my mirror, and you have told me you like yours - I am glad we don't
have the same mirrors.
|
