Stuart Taylor is one of the most fair journalists on the legal system out there.
Betsy's Page
I'm always impressed by his judicious approach to legal news. He has an article in the National Journal about how the media has rather egregiously mischaracterized its reporting on Samuel Alito.
<<<
The systematic slanting -- conscious or unconscious -- of this and many other news reports has helped fuel a disingenuous campaign by liberal groups and senators to caricature Alito as a conservative ideologue. In fact, this is a judge who -- while surely too conservative for the taste of liberal ideologues -- is widely admired by liberals, moderates, and conservatives who know him well as fair-minded, committed to apolitical judging, and wedded to no ideological agenda other than restraint in the exercise of judicial power.
>>>
Read through his examples. Part of the problem is that these journalists are not lawyers and, apparently, don't really understand what they're writing about. The rest of the problem is that they seem to be swallowing the accusations of some of the liberal interest groups without much analysis. For example,
<<<
I focus here not on the consistently mindless liberal hysteria of the New York Times' editorial page. Nor on such egregious factual errors as the assertion on C-SPAN, by Stephen Henderson of Knight Ridder Newspapers, that in a study of Alito's more than 300 judicial opinions, "we didn't find a single case in which Judge Alito sided with African-Americans ... [who were] alleging racial bias." This, Henderson added, is "rather remarkable."
What is remarkable is that any reporter could have overlooked the at least seven cases in which Alito has sided with African-Americans alleging racial bias. Also remarkable is the illiterate statistical analysis and loaded language used by Henderson and Howard Mintz in a 2,652-word article published (in whole or in part) by some 18 newspapers. It makes the highly misleading claim that in 15 years as a judge, Alito has sought "to weave a conservative legal agenda into the fabric of the nation's laws," including "a standard higher than the Supreme Court requires" for proving job discrimination.
>>>
betsyspage.blogspot.com
nationaljournal.com
philly.com |
