Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (16624)	12/2/1998 8:53:00 AM
From: greenspirit	of 67261

Michelle, res- <<<Short a few, you arent the first person to bring up Packwood in this debate about Clinton. I find this comparison rather interesting... its as if men dont understand the basic rules of order regarding desirable people vs undesirable people. Say some woman that you found undesirable was pursuing you, and they wouldnt quit... you probably wouldnt like it. But what if that woman looked like Michelle Pheiffer - then how would you feel? Say you took both of these cases to court - do you think the jury would rule exactly the same in both cases? No way! Theyd probably throw the Michelle Pheiffer case out.>>> I would consider sending my pants to the cleaners after thinking about your hunk for so long. :-) New code of ethics for the the new 90's. If you look good, you can break any law and sexually harass any woman. Gee, the NOW gang might be surprised at this new development. This could also add a new twist to sexual harassment training! :-) Michael

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next