SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (16631)9/16/2004 12:22:25 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) of 90947
 
AND THEN the plaintiff can subpoena the original documents and the matter can be settled. Once you have those, analysis of the ink and paper can definitively date them.

You really think the originals still exist? How dumb do you think people are? They have long since been shredded and burned. All we have are the copies.

Unless some really sharp attorney can find the computer they were prepared on, get it produced, and get a computer guru to recover a file that has been for sure deleted and probabably written over a couple of times. And that still does no good for the signatures, and the person can claim they were just playing around trying to recreate the documents as they saw them on the internet.

Nope. We'll never see a document with the original signature on it. On that I'm willing to place double my usual bet. A whopping four cents. Any takes?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext