SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 40.34-2.6%Dec 8 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: wanna_bmw who wrote (167572)7/8/2002 1:17:23 PM
From: K.Ramesh  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Isn't "a kid being forced to say the pledge" different from "the kid being forced to adopt
a different religious belief" ? We can argue endlessly as to whether forced reciting of the pledge by itself
is constitutional or not, but where is the coercion to adhere to a specific religion ?
As a Hindu parent I don't find anything offensive in the pledge and my 10-year old son
has been reciting this ever since KG. I have all along seen the pledge as to
what it is, i.e. owing allegiance to our country, the United States. I am amazed at the religious
twist being given to it, by that one phrase, and somehow seen as forcing Christianity on
everyone. I see the pledge only as an assertion of our firm belief that this a single nation
with diverse ethnic and religious faiths, having equal rights and freedoms.

Ramesh
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext