SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: LindyBill5/31/2006 6:57:06 AM
   of 793914
 
The Canadians Come Around to the U.S. Way of Thinking on Fighting Terrorists
Betsy's Page

Remember all the horror that the U.S. was not using the Geneva Convention with those we captured in Afghanistan and put in Guantanamo. The world was horrified that we weren't applying the rules of war to those who fought out of uniform and treating captured fighters under the regular rules for prisoners of war. Well, the Canadians have come to the same conclusion.

Canadian troops in Afghanistan have been told the Geneva Conventions and Canadian regulations regarding the rights of prisoners of war don't apply to Taliban and al-Qaeda fighters captured on the battlefield.

That decision strips detainees of key rights and protections under the rules of war, including the right to be released at the end of the conflict and not to be held criminally liable for lawful combat.

Now captured fighters can be treated as criminals or handed over to the Afghanistan authorities who might not be so tender of the fighters.

Thus, having fought in Afghanistan, the Canadians have come to the exact same conclusion that the Bush administration did and for which the U.S. was criticized by all sorts of groups such as Amnesty International. We'll see if Canada gets the same treatment.



More Rioting in France

Young thugs are rioting again in France.

Around 100 youths armed with sticks and baseball bats clashed with police in a Paris suburb, in the worst such violence since the riots of last November, police said.

The violence broke out in the town of Montfermeil east of Paris with trouble also erupting in nearby Clichy-sous-Bois -- the epicentre of last year's riots.

Clashes erupted Monday night when a gang attacked the mayor's home in Montfermeil, shaking its gates and hurling stones at the windows before facing off with police who responded with rubber bullets.

Youths also targeted the town hall, shattering its glass facade with stones and throwing Molotov cocktails which failed to ignite, and set fire to four cars and a large number of garbage bins.

Some 250 police officers were deployed as the violence spread to the nearby Bosquets housing estate, where gangs of masked youths clashed with police for more than four hours. Around 60 youths also clashed with police on a housing estate in Clichy-sous-Bois.

But the authorities insist that this is not related to the rioting that France experienced last year. They just regard it as normal rioting.

"These events should not be linked to the November riots -- they are sporadic incidents which, unfortunately, regularly accompany the work of police officers," the prefecture said in a statement.

"Regularly accompany the work of police officers?" Does that mean that it is the norm to have 100 youths storming the mayor's house and the town hall? Some state of normality over there.

And, of course, they blame the mayor for having his house attacked.

Local left-wing leaders charged in a joint statement that the trouble was sparked by the "heavy-handed" arrest of a woman from the Bosquets estate whose son was wanted in connection with a robbery.

Prosecutors confirmed that incidents broke out between youths and police after a woman and her son were taken into custody on Monday.

The mayor's office earlier said the trouble was sparked by the arrest of a youth accused of assaulting a bus driver, whom the mayor helped to identify.

The Montfermeil area has been tense since centre-right Mayor Xavier Lemoine in April passed two decrees seeking to ban gatherings of more than three youths in the town centre.

The decrees -- which caused a local outcry -- were blocked following legal action in an administrative court.

The UNSA police union issued a statement blaming the violence on the mayor's "rash decisions", while the statement by left-wing leaders accused his law-and-order policies of fuelling tensions.

"We are not surprised that the slightest spark -- in the circumstances -- leads to such violence," it said.

You got that? The mayor tries to take some action to prevent more riots and then helps to identify a hooligan who attacked a bus driver and now the police union is blaming the mayor for these kids rioting. Isn't that just typical of the French? They blame the one who is trying to stop the violence and thuggery, not the criminals themselves. Can't have that law-and-order attitude in France; that just gets the criminals all angry.

betsyspage.blogspot.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext