SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : NeoMedia Technologies (Bears Board)
NEOM 0.0001000+100.0%Oct 28 12:54 PM EDT

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: brewskih7/8/2008 11:11:42 AM
   of 194
 
This is for the poster who doesn't want the facts and misstatements known, in another blog he frequents. And by the way, I didn't use all the available facts in this because all of them were not necessary and would just make the statement even more ridicules by this poster. He claims he has a cost average of .017 on his Neomedia stock purchases.

And speaking of credibility you have non. Your own statements claimed you have worked in the telecom business since the mid 90's when you were 14 years old. Your own statements claimed you bought 50,000 shares of Neom when you first posted on another forum. Then in May 2006 you claimed you bought more shares on two separate occasions, at both .208 a share and at .20 a share. Then two months later in July you posted you held 50,000 shares, the original amount you claimed to have bought before your supposed May purchases.

You then also claimed in another post that you were one of the ones who bought in 2003 before the pps skyrocketed, and you were the smart investor who sold some of those shares for a profit and held onto the rest. But then in 2006 claimed you used your entire savings to buy the 50,000 shares you just purchased. You then went on to state how as a college student, you had to scrape together the money to buy those shares.

Then on April 3, 2008, you claimed you had a cost average of .08 a share, thats just two months ago. You sure must of been busy lately buying shares, and must be well over 1 million now right?

So even though I am no math expert, if you initially bought 50,000 shares at the .28 you now claim, and you exclude the purchases you claimed to have made in May 2006 on two occasions, you still would have had to buy 1 million shares at a pps no higher then .003 to get an average of .017 and that does not include the brokerage fees which are a part of your average.

But of course we know that even my best case scenario isn't accurate because in April 2008, the best price you could of bought at was around .007, and by then you had been buying so much you had your average down to .08 a share right?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext