Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ilaine who wrote (169762)	6/13/2006 6:28:09 PM
From: D. Long	Read Replies (2) of 793900

In a word, they weren't In a word, you need to reread that report, because once again it does not state what you assert. It says the "important fact" gleaned from Wilson's trip was the piece of info that Iraq was shopping in Niger, but it "added nothing" to the pie, and CIA was concentrating on the aluminum tubes, so it wasn't included in the reports. You keep conflating sale with shopping. CIA doubted that Iraq actually completed a contract of sale, not that they were there shopping. That is plain from the text. The forgery cropped up in October 2002, after all this analysis was concluded. So your continued use of the forgeries as the source of the wrong intelligence is, well, wrong. Derek

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next