PT: >>>"But the internet stock basher? The manipulator? The poster working for the shorter? Posting for the competition? One's own daytrading advantage?"<<<
JT: >>>Are you accusing me of these things?<<<
I didn't do that, did I?
PT: >>>"You, with no investment, only an agenda of some kind"<<<
JT: >>>How do you know that?<<<
How else would you describe it?
PT: >>>"What you posted was meant to imply that our investment is similar to what the example is that you cited"<<<
JT: >>> No it wasn't. It was general information that I thought might be of interest to readers here. No different than those recent posts pointing-out cases of people being sued by other companies for their on-line postings.<<<
Oh, uh-huh. And aren't you the same poseter who, in the past, has tried to implant into the thinking of the investor that an SEC investigation was in process? I'm sure there are those still posting on this thread who remember that.
Jon, I appreciate the sagely advise which you offer to investors. In fact, I actually do marvel at some of your work, having seen some of your contributions in non-Zulu-type venues. And I know that, overall, you wish to be more helpful than harmful. But not on matters concerning Zulu. When it comes to Zulu, there appears to be a venom of some kind that comes out of you and, to this very date, I don't understand it.
|
