Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Murrey Walker who wrote (169872)	6/14/2006 11:53:14 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (4) of 793846

If you attempt to speculate in court, opposing counsel will object "speculation, your Honor," or "no facts in evidence, your Honor," and the judge will say, "sustained." Keep doing it and you're risking a citation for contempt of court. Argument must be based on facts presented with certainty, not speculation. Pre-emptivity is what war is all about I think you're mistaken. It's true that throughout history, nations have attacked other nations -- Japan attacked the US at Pearl Harbor pre-emptively, Hitler attacked Russia pre-emptively. This is not considered a good thing. It's a violation of the law of war. We (America) have never done it before. The administration claimed that "9/11 changed everything" and we had to attack Iraq before Iraq attacked us first, using WMD, because the consequences of waiting would be dire.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next