SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Logain Ablar who wrote (169976)6/15/2006 11:49:15 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (2) of 793868
 
The US didn't attack North Vietnam.

The Communists (Vietminh) started attacking the French in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, after the end of World War II, and succeeded in getting them out after the Battle of Dien Bien Phu.

Vietnam was partitioned into North and South Vietnam by the Geneva Accords of 1954, signed by the French and the Vietminh (no other representatives from the Vietnamese people.) The accords provided for a cease-fire and called for free elections in 1956, elections which would pool votes in both North and South Vietnam, in order to unify the country.

South Vietnam refused to be bound by these accords because they did not want to be a party to electing Communists.

The US supported South Vietnam in order to prevent the spread of Communism to the rest of Southeast Asia, pursuant to protocols to the SEATO treaty.

The North Vietnamese attacked the South Vietnamese, our ally. US involvement was initially limited to military advisors sent in by President Kennedy. As the attacks on South Vietnam intensified, our involvement intensified.

Does any of this ring any bells?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext