Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (16991)	12/3/1998 4:28:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) of 67261

<<What do you think should be done about the "innappropriate behavior" of the "Christian Nation" crowd, as opposed to my own "disruptive and aggressive behavior"?>> My point on behaviorist theory is that the two behaviors are different. If you don't like a behavior but it is merely inappropriate (picking ones nose in public for example) ignoring the behavior will allow it to stop. Giving it attention on the other hand may be a signal to the picker that they found your button. Disruptive and or aggressive behavior is different however in that the motive behind the behavior is to effect you. This behavior is likely to escalate until the actor feels they have achieved satisfactory results. <<Do you believe Behavioralist theory?>> The theory is fairly well established. Social scientists apply it with fair predictability. Soft science is much less subject to control than hard science, so "believing" in it is not a term I use. Still it has its uses.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next