Apple Inc. Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.

AAPL 278.28

+0.1%

Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jeff Hayden who wrote (170040)	5/29/2014 10:36:43 PM
From: i-node	of 213176

Rundown - all the Beats had strong but muddy (too strong) bass with reasonably strong midrange for voice and treble. Unfortunately the bass seemed to muck up the clarity. The Bose were better as the bass wasn't as muddy, but not totally clear.. All but one Bose was on-ear, the Quiet Comfort 15 at $300 was over-ear. It was pretty good until I tried the Bang & Olufson H6 at $400 - this over-ear headset is as clear as a very good in-house sound system. I told myself that the B&O was too expensive for me, so started rechecking the other headsets. I was set on getting an over-ear headset as comfort was my first priority. I only had the two choices, the Bose and the B&O. $300 or $400? I decided on the B&O after all - if you're in for $300, why not $400? Audio Review has a review of one model of the Beats, and that review suggested the Beats was heavy on the bass, which I guess you would expect. It also talked about the discomfort, which has been a problem with every set of headphones I've owned save for some old Grados I had years ago. As it now stands the Beats product line looks pretty low-end to me with really big price tags. Still, that's not what marketing is about.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next