<<.. Recovery is he only thing that really
matters. Thats the end game. If any group can put out assays, COC of course, multiple
labs and a methodology for scaling that up to bulk testing (immediately) I would support
them whole totally. ..>> In regards to the terms and conditions of the original J-L Contract with Naxos, if Naxos would not GIVE them a third of the company there would be no "Mutually Exclusive Agreement" and thus; J-L would be allowed to use their workable tech with othersw. IE- MG Natural Resources in this past weeks' topic of discussion.
So, if J-L has a recovery system and no deal with Naxos, what would they do. They would do what they did. Just - imho.
Maybe there is a Tech that works, and we are dealing with non-patentable situations, a cause of all this....not the RECOVERY and Upscale issues. But maybe other some Naxos folks, like Mark, think I have missed it. Mark, would welcome your imput. I think that a few weeks ago, I heard that if SOMEONE COULD SHOE RECOVERYT and METALS IN HAND; I would support it. Since that time...all this has happened at my little favorite triple play baseball team- MGAU. Yes, it was high up in MG that that statement was Recovery Alluded to. There must have something, I tell you listen for that between the lines and if you want recovery, support MG and Support Naxos and it may be based on J-L RECOVERY. ( Speaking about RECOVERY, Hewletts Maxam Combined Process IN NUMBER ONE in my minds eye, still.
Best to all, hang tuff-hang ten, ten bag or what?
Chuca |
