Any info about Iomega (IOM)? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neil_L who wrote (17339)	3/2/1997 12:06:00 AM
From: jwk	of 58324

Neil - >From this weeks Barrons. . .< Barrons has had a long and consistent record of bashing IOM. If you recall, last summer they managed to print a very negative article on IOM just before options expiration for at least three months in a row. I'm not saying it was anything other than what it was (no conspiracy insinuations intended). But, it is reasonable to consider the source on this one (imho). Nothing new, nothing different - still, I'd like to see IOM get past these types of remarks in this level of publication. At least the WSJ didn't make a negative comment about IOM when they were included in the top performance list the other day. That is a least a step in the right direction. The height of Barrons depths was the article that reprinted, as breaking news, the standard cautionary boilerplate from the 10Q (K?) -"the sky could fall on us tomorrow and/or on our suppliers, and/or...ect.". For those following the IOM story, I think that one clearly showed either incredibly inept reporting, or some considerable degree of negative bias.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next