Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: GST who wrote (173639)	10/30/2005 5:08:42 PM
From: Hawkmoon	of 281500

I opposed an illegal and unwise unilateral invasion that has harmed the interests of the United States and played right into the hands of our enemies. Were this war is "illegal", then why haven't folks initiated article of impeachment against Bush?? Maybe because those very same legislators voted for it? The war was legal, both according to US law, as well as International Law, (per the United Nations Charter and Iraq's violation of the UN cease fire agreement in 1991 UNSC resolution 687). In fact, UNSC resolution 1441, declaring Iraq in material breach of that cease fire, was passed UNANIMOUSLY. That sounds pretty "legal" to me... So just because you say it's "illegal" doesn't mean that it is. Why don't you settle for a more subjective term.. something "touchy-feely" like "immoral".. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next