SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bill Wexler's Profits of DOOM

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jim wick who wrote (1735)7/23/1998 6:05:00 AM
From: Graeme Smith  Read Replies (1) of 4634
 
Jim,

If you look closely I am not even recommending shorting SEEC. It is already trading at book value and so has little down side. I might even consider buying it long as a hedge against my Y2K shorts. It was included in the portfolio for two reasons. One it illustrated that Y2K stocks can, and will trade at book value. Secondly it gave a perspective on how wildly overvalued some of the Y2K stocks are. SEEC is priced at a 12% discount to its estimated Y2K book value. ALYD on the other hand is priced at about 7 times optimistic Y2K book value. All bad news is priced into SEEC, and when reality is priced into ALYD it too will be trading at a 10th of its value.

Also, I am not so niave as to think that contracts will stop coming in on Jan 1, 2000. I think most of them will dry up by Jan 1, 1999. Contracts are signed (usually) prior to beginning work on Y2K. Since most large companies are scheduled to be finished by October to December of this year, most big contracts have been negotiated and signed already.

All that said, I'm quite glad to be called a pinhead. I get jealous when the likes of Bill and Dr Suess seem to get all the abuse.

Graeme
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext