SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM)
MDMN 0.000001000-99.0%Jun 3 1:07 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Handshake™ who wrote (17395)7/20/1999 1:38:00 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw   of 25548
 
From this last CDCH release:

"Located on this property is the former producing gold mine ``La Fortuna de Lampa'...[snip]...similar to Medinah Mining's nearby recently discovred Alto de Lipangue gold-copper breccia pipe...."

From MDHM a year ago:

"His work concentrated mainly on the Alto De Lipangue property, formerly the La Fortuna de Lampa Mine"

Hmmm...the same property? There is only only one 'Fortuna De Lampa' mine; is it on Medinah's property or is it on CDCH's property?

More...this is from a mid-April Medinah release stating they closed on some properties:

"Located on the property is the recent Alto de Lipangue discovery."

So Medinah appears to "own" the chunk of land with the old mine. Maybe this is part of the stuff handed over to Medinah Gold and then split with CDCH? Nope...

"all assets of Medinah Energy, Inc. - except the Alto de
Lipangue and Las dos Marias properties - are to be sold to the wholly owned subsidiary, Medinah Gold"

And finally: CDCH is a post-reverse-split creation of a bankrupt shell purchased by Les Phillip Price. Doesn't it strike you as odd that all these companies that have him as a principal are busy swapping properties around between themselves?

While we're at it, how can Medinah Gold be a wholly-owned subsidiary of Medinah Mining when they're issuing certs to other shareholders? And how come Russell Godwin issued a PR stating he had 10% ownership of MXR at the exact same time he was selling what was left of his stake during a price spike?

I think this is at least worth clarifying, don't you?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News