SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (17428)1/27/2006 3:56:42 AM
From: Sully-   of 35834
 
Heh! Heh! The right wing MSM!

:-)

Memo to Lefties: Hire David Copperfield

Media Blog
Stephen Spruiell Reporting

I think Markos missed the point of my post about the left's revolution against the media. He writes:

<<< Watch conservatives fret at our efforts to hold the media accountable. But wait — why should they be worried about our efforts if the media is already as liberal as they claim? Maybe because it's theirs, and they don't want to let go? >>>


Yeah, that's it. What would we conservatives do if we lost the New York Times, the Washington Post, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, most of the major daily newspapers and public broadcasting (to the libs on the left)?

Maybe it would have helped if I had called the post "The Civil War Between the Left and the Media." Then my comparison of the media to the Democratic Party in the analogy would have been more clear. Ever since Clinton and Al Gore embraced centrist politics during the '90s, a growing and increasingly vocal faction on the left has called for the Democratic Party to abandon "centrism" and return to its "populist" roots. This is the same movement that backed Howard Dean in his campaign for president, as described in Kos's forthcoming book 'Crashing the Gate':

<<< As noted earlier, the 2002 campaign finance reform law radically changed the political landscape. Soft-dollar donations were suddenly out of reach, and with the electoral disasters of 2000 and 2002, the [centrist Democratic Leadership Committee] and the establishment in D.C. were at a complete loss. The candidates they favored for the 2004 presidential line-up — like Lieberman and Gephardt — were still living in the 1990s, ill-prepared to operate in this new political terrain where energizing Democratic voters is far more important than sucking up to big-money interests.

None of them understood the growth of this new movement or its sheer size, even as it gathered steam, powering the Dean phenomenon. If anything, the Democratic establishment perceived it as a serious threat. The centrist minds at the DLC had a difficult strategic question to answer heading into the Democratic primaries: How could they keep this new populist movement at bay and ensure a beltway-friendly Democratic presidential nominee? The answer was to redefine these outsiders and the Dean campaign as the new incarnation of the party's now-dead 1970s-1990's liberal wing.

The DLC took point position in the battle against Dean. >>>


In my post, I argued that this faction's recent campaign against the media has some of the same characteristics — the same disillusionment with the "inside-the-beltway" mentality of a liberal institution expressed through an Internet-based campaign to make that institution accountable to the grassroots of the political left.

Read more here.

media.nationalreview.com


Rather than respond to my argument, Kos chose to call me an idiot for writing a one-line description of his book without having read it -- a criticism I notice he has not extended to his fellow left-wing bloggers who have argued that my colleague Kate O'Beirne should drop dead and have written lengthy reviews of her book while admitting they "haven't read her book" and "wouldn't read her book."

I haven't read Crashing the Gate (I somehow never got a review copy), and I understand it's less about ideology and more about tactics. I wasn't even criticizing it. My point is that at least part of the left's current gripe with the Democratic Party is that it has drifted too close to the center on certain issues. Witness the left's repudiation of Joe Lieberman and, in some circles, Hillary Clinton.

I don't understand what's so objectionable my comparison of that gripe to this latest gripe about the media. So you want the media to move further to the left. Fine. But if you want to argue that conservatives are worried about your efforts because the media is ours, you'd better hire David Copperfield. Convincing people that the media suffer from "conservative bias" is going to be harder than walking through the Great Wall of China or making the Statue of Liberty disappear.

media.nationalreview.com

dailykos.com

media.nationalreview.com

dailykos.com

media.nationalreview.com

dailykos.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext