SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: TimF4/29/2010 2:28:53 PM
   of 42652
 
The Federal Budget: One Chart and One Table



From Villainous Company, via JamulBlog.



From Ezra Klein, via Megan McArdle. Here's what Klein says:

From Ezra Klein, via Megan McArdle. Here's what Klein says:

Another way of putting this: I've heard Tyler Cowen say that he asks conservatives when they'll support a VAT. It's easy (at least in theory) to support deep spending cuts in year one and year two and year three and year four, but straight cuts through to year 40? And beyond? Eventually, you need revenue. And I'd say the same goes for liberals: You can raise taxes on the rich in year one and year two and year three, but in year 40?

Eventually, we're just going to have to get the growth of health-care costs down. There's simply no other way.


Hold your horses. That should read "Eventually, we're just going to have to get the growth of government spending on health-care down. There's simply no other way." The problem with the budget is that the government writes blank checks for health care AND that people want to consume lots of resources in the form of health care. The fact that costs are high are not themselves a problem. The problem is that they are high and the government has made lots of open-ended promises to but health care for people...

southbend7.blogspot.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext