SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.
AAPL 274.11-1.5%Dec 15 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ryan Bartholomew who wrote (175903)10/15/2014 10:24:53 AM
From: HerbVic1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Moonray

  Read Replies (1) of 213176
 
I think the bigger assumption is yours. Ireland isn't going to suddenly go to a normalized tax rate. Read this from the article you posted.

The impact on companies' profits will be reduced by a new scheme announced by Noonan under which profits linked to the exploitation of patents will attract lower tax rates. Britain already has such a scheme, under which profits linked even tangentially to a patent can face a tax rate of 10 percent.

The Netherlands' " innovation box" scheme applies a tax rate of just 5 percent, although the eligible profits are more restricted than under the British regime, tax advisers say.

Kevin McLoughlin, tax adviser with consultants EY said the new patent tax regime "will allow Ireland to continue to compete effectively for international investment".

reuters.com

There are a lot of if's here, so any speculation has a high margin for error. But, if Apple is currently paying ~3.5% and that goes to 5%, and if the $12B tax avoidance is a comparison against a 29% US tax, then Apple is likely to lose .059% of its $12B, or roughly about $706 million.

That's .29 - .035 = 0.255 and

.05 - .035 = .015 and

.015 / .255 = .059
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext