SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask God

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: PROLIFE who wrote (17642)6/16/1998 11:31:00 PM
From: Father Terrence   of 39621
 
DCF:

My, what a pleasant mood you're in tonight, you mystical zealot!

"Take the easy way out coward."

You call me a coward when you are afraid of reality and must wrap yourself in an illusion created by men barely out of the caves?Science must define it because no religious group has the right to and it isn't a political issue, it is a Constitutional issue. Therefore, the government should stay out of it too. It is science's job to define when a fetus becomes a human. (Obviously rational thought would not apply in that definition, else you would not be defined as a human.)

"A two day old baby can not live when left on its own...would you kill him/her too?"

DCF, do you practice being a moron? Or does it just come naturally? I said artificial life support. Now unless you think the mother and father are robots, a la "The Stepford Wives", then the mother's and father's support are NOT artificial. I advise you to read more carefully before you post a response to me. It's all right if your lips move when you read -- no one can see you.

"So get your lawyer and start filing criminal charges.cause here is what happens in a partial birth abortion.....

"The abortionist uses ultrasound to identify. . ." <snip>

I said, "fully self-supporting infants". Unless the infant is fully self-supporting outside the womb, under the present law nothing can be done. I am against the murder of children. It depends how you define a child. For all I know you may define an organism within the human womb such as a zygote as human -- many christians do. If you do not, when is the organism human in your opinion? (And that's all it is -- your opinion -- until science defines it.)

"Now how about those "womens rights" ???? I guess being politically correct is more important than life huh? Remember they do this to FEMALE babies also........who is right here??"

I am not politically correct, you fool, I am Constitutionally correct. Political correctness is a mirror image of Orwell's "doublespeak". Women do have rights over their own body. Even, by your belief, god doesn't have any rights over a woman's body since each woman has free will. And yes, their right supercedes that of an unborn, undefined organism that medical science has thus far refused to go on record to define the critical point when human life actually begins. Is it at conception? At the first week? Second? Third? Etc.

Father Terrence
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext