SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (1606)4/6/2004 6:10:03 PM
From: Sully-   of 35834
 
In December 2000, Clinton's National Security Adviser
Sandy Berger specifically wrote that the USA
should "intensify both our planning for a post Saddam
Iraq, and our efforts to speed its arrival."

Laser-Like Focus, Part III


powerlineblog

Day before yesterday, reader Daniel Aronstein pointed out an article by Clinton's National Security Adviser, Sandy Berger, in the Nov./Dec. issue of Foreign Affairs. As we quoted Daniel:

[The article] thoroughly reviews so-called Clinton Administration successes (like North Korea!) and outlines what Clinton's National Security Advisor - on behalf of the Clinton Administration - saw as the emerging chief global security issues.

The title of the article was, appropriately, "A Foreign Policy for the Global Age".
foreignpolicy2000.org

In this article, Berger mentions terrorism ONCE , in passing - in a single paragraph, three pages from the end(MY EDIT: TERRORISM is mentioned only 4 times in this lengthy article - Tim). Islamo-terrorism gets equal billing with all others on every continent, and <font size=4>he did not specifically mention either al Qaeda or UBL.<font size=3>

Daniel has now written to add that, while failing to mention al Qaeda, Berger did talk about Iraq:
<font size=4>
Berger specifically wrote that the USA should "intensify both our planning for a post Saddam Iraq, and our efforts to speed its arrival."

Daniel wonders how Richard Clarke can blame the Bush administration for doing "exactly what Berger and the Clinton administration recommended vis a vis Iraq."
<font size=3>
Well, to be fair to the Clinton administration, I think it's clear that they only intended to talk about liberating Iraq, and wouldn't have dreamed of actually doing it. Still, when <font size=4>Berger, in the last days of the Clinton administration, writes what poses as a definitive paper on "A Foreign Policy for the Global Age," and talks about Iraq but not al Qaeda, it does make one wonder where, exactly, Clarke saw evidence of the Clintonites' focus on bin Laden.<font size=3>

Posted by Hindrocket at 09:15 AM | Permalink | TrackBack (0)

powerlineblog.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext