SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : SCO Group (SCOX)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scott C. Lemon who wrote (180)4/13/2007 4:31:36 PM
From: CrazyPete   of 239
 
Frankenberg's deposition is convincing but it isn't clear why, if what he said is true, the APA plainly and explicitly excludes all copyrights if this was never anyone's intent (yes I know about the amendments).

Also copyright law is completely unambiguous about what is required to transfer copyrights, and is unlike contract law where intent may matter. You've got to have a document saying with specificity which copyrights are transferred.

As for O'Gara's testimony, the operative word there is "conveyed". The quoted words are O'Gara's imputations, they are not even hearsay. O'Gara is not suggesting that Stone said those things, she is only saying this is what she thought he meant.

I don't think there's anything illegal about issuing a press release about an ongoing issue with another company that might have a negative impact on that company, however you choose to time it. Unless you think the information was plainly false and fraudulent. Novell didn't stand to benefit from any purported manipulation of SCOX's stock price.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News