Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (182509)	2/12/2004 6:22:39 PM
From: Road Walker	of 1576369

Ten, re: No, it wasn't. Saddam wasn't being compliant, the inspections couldn't be conclusive one way or another, and the "oil-for-palaces" program was a smack in the face of U.N. humanitarianism. Being "comliant", "coundn't be conclusive", and "oil-for-palaces" are not legitimate reasons to overthrow and occupy, with US troops. Bush knew that, that's why he framed the argument as a threat to US soil. If we accept that with the new Bush doctrine, those three things are legitimate justifications to impose our political will through our military, then we will be very busy. John

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next