SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Canada Carbon CCB-V
CCB 107.73+1.2%4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RSCorky who wrote (1832)6/5/2017 8:53:35 PM
From: the Chief1 Recommendation

Recommended By
hoperrs

  Read Replies (1) of 1871
 
So just to confirm your rebuttal.

1) some of the protestors at the mine protest were actually there to protest a completely unrelated issue. They weren't there to protest the mine but rather the expropriation of their dairy farming land (citation needed).

Yes: Contact the Cowan Family, they were part of the March. Gary Cowan was an exMayor of GSLR and he is against Saywell and the attack on a farmer in his district, I suggest you get better info in the future.
Secondly you will note that none of the tractors carried No Mine signs thats because they were there to support the Cowan Family and the individual who is being threatened with expropriation. If you read some of the signs carried by protestors near the tractors they were NOT mine signs.

2) the mine has already passed an EA that has not been made public, but which you have read although likely cannot produce here, and the mine has also gotten approval from the MRC, as proven by a source that you have also seen but cannot produce here. And the MRC approved that based on the independent study they requested. Which I'm sure you've also seen but cannot produce here.

Its a good thing you are here to learn as opposed too making rash statements. ALL EA data is posted on the CCB website you should attempt to read it. MRC and GSLR approved the mine in a letter dated Mar 14 2017 stated in the Minutes of the Meeting. I suggest if you intend on being a smart ass and knowledgeable on GSLR affairs you should read the minutes of the meetings.
MRC/GSLR did not withdraw that approval when they requested an independant study on the County and Municipal Wells. They just asked CCB to do it. CCB has done it and MRC/GSLR are happy. It is not part of a formal submission too CPTAQ so was not needed for CPTAQ.
There are specific EAs needed and they have been completed and passed. I am not saying that if the one requested by MRC/GSLR was a failure it was irrelevant because it was not. But because it passed its irrelevant to the process. Enjoy knowing the little you do.

And he accuses ME of distortion. Protesters there for other reasons? Gimme a break. Even someone who is that senile/dishonest could do better than that

There were 3 groups there.
1) Protesting Saywell, which you purposely incorrectly identified as the Diary group, against the Mine. They are not, and were not protesting the mine. Best you learn more about GSLR Politics before making another stupid statement.
2) The invited guests of Le Gris from the Hawkesbury side of the River with no other interest but to help him out.
3) A total of 92 real protestors the ones that actually walked in and sat down in the church. out of a total of 6300 people

Of those 92 protestors, we know of about 24 that do not live in GSLR or MRC and are semi-profesional protestors that protest for protest sake.

Have a wonderful day.


Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News