Novell (NOVL) dirt cheap, good buy? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Novell (NOVL) dirt cheap, good buy?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Scott C. Lemon who wrote (18339)	11/4/1997 12:54:00 AM
From: David A. Lethe	Read Replies (1) of 42771

Hi Scott: OK we finally agree on JAVA/NLMs and everything in our most recent exchanges of comments... >Yes, but I'm still not impressed when I compare it to Visual C++ or Visual Basic ... Microsoft has done a slick job with it's developer tools ... Check out the brand new JDK for the AS400... very sexy, however it is certainly out of the price range of the average developer. Give IBM credit, they see JAVA as being very important in the future to spend all of those millions in R&D for it. >But I am somewhat confused by your statement ... when you say "run serve) application code." you are talking about two completely different things ... I think. To "run" the code means execution on the NetWare platform ... to "serve" the code could be to deliver the code to a client platform for execution (as in serving a web page). I should of just said that netware needs to have a killer JVM with some nifty value-added features (applets). See IBMs new announcement, they have the right idea. >I'm not sure what you are comparing here ... I'm guessing that a parallel arguement would be that you tend to waste time with such unknown technologies such as SSA (which I too believe is technically superior) while the press, manufacturers, and the world are talking non-stop about Fibre OK Scott, this one hurts :) First IBM SSA has been shipping since 94, and has sold almost 2 petabytes. Seagate, hasn't even frozen the firmware in their disk drives yet!!! SSA generally outperforms fiber, and is cheaper. SSA can be hot-swapped, and has built-in redundancy. As it is a serial loop technology, I can do concurrent non-arbitrated reads and writes to disks. Just try doing that with SCSI or Fiber. Several vendors even ship SSA subsystems and controllers with Novell-certified SSA drivers. I can sustain nearly 60 MB/sec per SSA controller in a Compaq. David

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next