NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera!

NAMX 0.0001000

0.0%

Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: paul j. gourley who wrote (1834)	12/18/1997 11:07:00 AM
From: Sidney Reilly	Read Replies (1) of 4736

paul, I appreciate your effort to do some DD. But the calling companies that NAE is negotiating with may be counter productive. These are big companies. Example with UPR many called and were all told their was no agreement, no more explanation than that. No statement such as we are negotiating now was made by UPR even though they/we were. They did not want us to know and were not going to tell us anything. Some even talked to the man himself (Shoemocker) who said this even though negotiations were going on. The naysayers played that to the hilt on the thread at the time. Now signing of a UPR/NAE agreement seems to be close at hand. It has taken many months. Now if investors call BR and get the same response don't be surprised. If investors in NAE start calling BR and it annoys them I hope it will not cause problems with the NAE/BR relationship. There is an interest for the sake of DD to call but also an interest not to put a fly in the ointment for the company. This is just my take on calling before an agreement is finalized. I'm sure others will dissent! cya, Bob

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next