Welcome to Slider's Dugout Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: pogohere who wrote (18474)	8/6/2009 12:01:47 PM
From: Webster Groves	2 Recommendations of 50468

The actual healthcare "delivery" comes from doctors and hospitals, most of whom are private "vendors". Unless the government intends to create a federalized healthcare workforce and facilities, the morbidity results will not change regardless of whether the government or private insurance is covering the bill. Presumably if neither covers the bill, the healthcare is not "delivered" next time around. The question really is whether a for-profit claims processing service we call "insurance" adds anything beneficial to the equation. I think not. It just adds to the cost. wg

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next