SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 483.03+0.5%Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John F. Dowd who wrote (18571)3/22/1999 9:42:00 PM
From: RTev  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
Jackson more than anyone wants a settlement as he would not like to be overturned yet again.

I doubt that's much of a consideration, but sure, he'd like a settlement just as every judge likes to see a settlement in any civil suit that comes before him. Why? It saves him and his staff a great deal of work -- especially when it's a case as complex as an antitrust case.

But would he become more favorably disposed toward Microsoft if they talk but fail to settle? I really doubt it. Why would he favor a defendant when the trial has left their case in shambles? Those were far more than theatrics. Boies managed to weaken the credibility (and thus the "facts") of witness after witness put on the stand by Microsoft. So if Microsoft goes into settlement talks with nothing significant to offer, they will simply look recalcitrant. The judge is just as likely to become even more miffed at them.

But will any of that matter? Probably not. I doubt Microsoft will settle before a verdict. I doubt they'll settle even after a strongly negative verdict. No matter how much it costs. No matter how much energy it drains, Microsoft seems prepared to fight this.

And maybe there is hope:
salonmagazine.com
Tripping the antitrust scales
How the right helped make the federal courts safe for Microsoft

It's not just that the particular court certain to hear
any appeal is dominated by conservative
Reagan-Bush appointees who look askance at
government intervention in the economy --
although that certainly helps. More troubling, say
some antitrust experts, is the entire federal
judiciary's resistance to aggressive enforcement of
the antitrust laws -- a reluctance that may in large
part be due to the influence of a well-funded
campaign to exalt one particular school of legal
thought over all others: a discipline known as "law
and economics."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext