SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask God
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mark silvers who wrote (18870)7/6/1998 3:11:00 PM
From: Emile Vidrine   of 39621
 
Raymond Norris is a demon possessed heretic who would exalt his and Mohammad's false testimonies above the testimony of the Son of God. The testimonies of the Apostles concerning the Crucifixion are diametrically opposite to the false testimony of Norris and Mohammad. The testimony of Jesus and the eyewitness Apostles and disciples are diametrically opposite to Mohammad's and Norris's "spiritualist trance" testimonies. There is no forensic foundation for Norri's false testimony.
Raymond's testimony is transparently false and has no foundation in reality. It is the testimony of a charlatan and a demon possessed spiritualists.
The testimony of Jesus and the Apostles is true and anchored in historical as well as spiritual reality. The cornerstone events of Christianity are anchored on verifialbe historical events.
The normal judiciary procedure of determining truth can easily be applied to Raymond Norris's and Mohammad's false testimonies and their false testimones uncovered.
Jesus gave us the historical reality of the Incarnation, Crucifixion, and Resurrection to anchor our faith. Mohammad and Norris give you nothing but irrationality and whimsical material from "trances'.
There is no substance to Norris and Mohammad's false claims.

It all boils down to:

The Crucifixion of Jesus has numerous eyewitness account to verfy its authenticity and its historicity. Mohammad and Norris cannot provide even one eyewitness account to substantiate their possession. They are charlatans with no credibility.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News