Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (189729)	6/20/2006 9:04:39 AM
From: michael97123	of 281500

"Ahmedinijad may or may not be a nutter; you really want his finger on the button? Remember, that MAD and the Cold War Standoff were not exactly a US choice; it was that or outright war." Exactly my point. Iran needs to be contained and deterred. But part of the way to get there is to treat them at least as well as we did the soviets. Our demands are no nuke weapons, normalization with israel, no more terror, cooperation in iraq and US participation alongside china and russia in irans development including oil and gas. And their carrot is economic normalization and entering the family of nations. Is this such a bad deal for us? Are we all of a sudden going to stand on ceremony for iranian democracy and freedom when we dont do the same for current day china, not to mention the deals we made with the soviets.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next