Thank you for choosing United, Mr. bin Laden
Ann Coulter
April 15, 2004
<font size=4>
Last week, 9-11 commissioner John Lehman revealed that "it was the policy (before 9-11) and I believe remains the policy today to fine airlines if they have more than two young Arab males in secondary questioning because that's discriminatory." Hmmm ... Is 19 more than two? Why, yes, I believe it is. So if two Jordanian cab drivers are searched before boarding a flight out of Newark, Osama bin Laden could then board that plane without being questioned. I'm no security expert, but I'm pretty sure this gives terrorists an opening for an attack.
<font size=5>
In a sane world, Lehman's statement would have made
headlines across the country the next day. But not one
newspaper, magazine or TV show has mentioned that it is
official government policy to prohibit searching more than
two Arabs per flight.
<font size=4>
Meanwhile, another 9-11 commissioner, the greasy Richard Ben-Veniste, claimed to be outraged that the CIA did not immediately give intelligence on 9-11 hijackers Nawaf Alhazmi and Khalid Almihdhar to the FBI. As we now know – or rather, I alone know because I'm the only person in America watching the 9-11 hearings – Ben-Veniste should have asked his fellow commissioner Jamie Gorelick about that.
In his testimony this week, John Ashcroft explained that the FBI wasn't even told Almihdhar and Alhazmi were in the country until weeks before the 9-11 attack – because of Justice Department guidelines put into place in 1995. The FBI wasn't allowed to put al-Qaida specialists on the hunt for Almihdhar and Alhazmi – because of Justice Department guidelines put into place in 1995. Indeed, the FBI couldn't get a warrant to search Zacarias Moussaoui's computer – because of Justice Department guidelines put into place in 1995.
The famed 1995 guidelines were set forth in a classified memorandum written by the then-deputy attorney general titled "Instructions for Separation of Certain Foreign Counterintelligence and Criminal Investigations," which imposed a "draconian" wall between counterintelligence and criminal investigations.
<font size=5>
What Ashcroft said next was breathtaking. Prohibited from
mounting a serious search for Almihdhar and Alhazmi, an
irritated FBI investigator wrote to FBI headquarters,
warning that someone would die because of these policies –
"since the biggest threat to us, OBL (Osama bin Laden),
is getting the most protection."
FBI headquarters responded: "We're all frustrated with
this issue. These are the rules. NSLU (National Security
Law Unit) does not make them up. But somebody did make
these rules. Somebody built this wall."
The person who built that wall described in the infamous
1995 memo, Ashcroft said, "is a member of the commission."
<font size=4>
If this were an episode of "Matlock," the camera would slowly pan away from Ashcroft's face at this point and then quickly jump to an extreme close-up of Jamie Gorelick's horrified expression. Armed marshals would then escort the kicking, screaming Gorelick away in leg irons as the closing credits rolled. Gorelick was the deputy attorney general in 1995.
The 9-11 commission has finally uncovered the proverbial "smoking gun"! But it was fired by one of the 9-11 commissioners. Maybe between happy reminiscences about the good old days of Ruby Ridge, Waco and the Elian Gonzales raid, Ben-Veniste could ask Gorelick about those guidelines.
<font size=5>
Democrats think it's a conflict of interest for Justice
Scalia to have his name in the same phonebook as Dick
Cheney. But there is no conflict of interest having
Gorelick sit on a commission that should be investigating
her.
<font size=4>
Bill O'Reilly's entire summary of Ashcroft's testimony was to accuse Ashcroft of throwing sheets over naked statues rather than fighting terrorism. No mention of the damning Gorelick memo. No one knows about the FAA's No-Searching-Arabs counterterrorism policy.
<font size=5>
Predictions that conservatives have finally broken through
the wall of sound coming from the mainstream media may
have been premature.
When Democrats make an accusation against Republicans,
newspaper headlines repeat the accusation as a fact: "U.S.
Law Chief 'Failed to Heed Terror Warnings,'" "Bush Was
Told of Qaida Steps Pre-9-11; Secret Memo Released," "Bush
White House Said to Have Failed to Make al-Qaida an Early
Priority."
But when Republicans make accusations against Democrats –
even accusations backed up by the hard fact of a
declassified Jamie Gorelick memo – the headlines note only
that Republicans are making accusations: "Ashcroft Lays
Blame at Clinton's Feet," "Ashcroft: Blame Bubba for 9-
11," "Ashcroft Faults Clinton in 9-11 Failures."
<font size=4>
It's amazing how consistent it is. A classic of the genre was the Chicago Tribune headline, which managed to use both constructs in a single headline: "Ashcroft Ignored Terrorism, Panel Told; Attorney General Denies Charges, Blames Clinton." Why not: "Reno Ignored Terrorism, Panel Told; Former Deputy Attorney General Denies Charges, Blames Bush"?
<font size=5>
Democrats actively created policies that were designed to
hamstring terrorism investigations. The only rap against
the Bush administration is that it failed to unravel the
entire 9-11 terrorism plot based on a memo titled: "Bin
Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States."
I have news for liberals: Bin Laden is still determined to
attack inside the United States! Could they please tell us
when and where the next attack will be? Because unless we
know that, it's going to be difficult to stop it if we
can't search Arabs.
<font size=3>
Ann Coulter is host of AnnCoulter.org, a Townhall.com member group. |
