The game now is to find a way of making it seem that 
    Scalia's personal life and conduct commit him to positions
    on important legal issues in a way that interferes with 
    his ability to decide matters impartially - not because 
    Scalia has in fact done so and not because his accusers 
    care about impartiality. Instead, the game matters because
    Scalia is the leading voice for a set of legal 
    propositions that run counter to the political, social, 
    and constitutional agenda of the dominant voices in 
    almost every major element of America's Speaking elites.