No, no, Donny. Stop examining yourself for signs of puberty and notice that I updated my prediction after making that comment. Even had I not done so, is there something wrong with the fact that I EXPECTED the stock to be above 30 by now but that it is not? I never claimed to be perfect - I only claimed to be far more skilled and intelligent than you. I believe that anyone who follows this thread or takes the time to go back and read the archives would agree. After all, to this day you refuse to publicly state YOUR prediction on Overture's price, both short term and long. I challenge you to take me to task on any of these assertions, and I challenge you for perhaps the 10th time to please post your exact numerical predictions now. Your hindsight and lies really havent done much for your image, now have they?
Overture is still undervalued, it has still performed quite well historically (especially benchmarked against the market), and it still has a bright future driven by earnings growth. Patience, little boy, patience. Again, I suggest you take a look at this before you comment on Overture's track record (even though it is the future, not the past, that really matters - I still like to highlight your idiocy): finance.yahoo.com Yes, I realize it was much higher in early 2000 and subsequently tanked. No, I did not own it back then nor did I ever say that it was fairly valued at that time. I have believed this stock has been undervalued (to varying degrees) ever since I purchased it in the low teens a couple years ago and thus far I have proven to be correct and have made enormous profits in the process. Unlike you, I have old posts prove it. I have made my predictions before the events have occurred, not after. |
