Did Slick Boink Monica? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (19200)	9/14/1998 5:38:00 PM
From: Hunter Vann	of 20981

There was no need to go into that level of detail and even if you make the argument that the details were needed to substantiate the claim then this is not a document for public airing over the internet then is it? I disagree. I think the graphic details were essential in substantiating the numerous claims and accusations. As for the releasing of the document via the internet, I was unaware that was Mr. Starr's decision. I was under the impression that it was the decision of the Judiciary committee. However, I could be wrong. Rediculous, absurd this Starr report is The only ridiculous thing about the Starr Report is the guy with the leading part. He brought this upon himself. Don't let selfishness get in the way of sensibility. The man lied under oath. It becomes a whole new ballgame when you raise your right hand. And without the dress, he gets away with it. Perjury, obstruction of justice, and abuse of power are in my opinion impeachable offenses. I don't give a damn what the subject material is that he lied about. It makes no difference to me. It could be sex or selling guns to Castro. Clinton was just in it for a cheap thrill, he thought he could get away with it. Clinton's whole life has revolved around getting a cheap thrill. He's got a sickness. He needs help. I can forgive, but I can't forget. Starr was producing a legal document from the beginning! Starr was hired by a three judge panel to investigate the President of the United States. Grow up this is not appropriate! I conclude hes some kind of a pervert. I think we all know what was not appropriate. Getting BJs from a 21 year old intern while talking to members of Congress is certainly not appropriate. Trying to manipulate the truth with deceitful tactics is also not appropriate. Lying under oath about your involvement with this young intern is certainly not appropriate. Clinton's legacy will be marked by his inappropriate behavior.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next