Banyan Announces Updated Pit-Constrained Mineral Resource Estimate for Hyland Gold Project, Yukon, Canada
  accessnewswire.com
   VANCOUVER, BC /  ACCESS Newswire / October 27, 2025 / Banyan Gold Corp. (the "Company" or "Banyan") (TSX-V:BYN)(OTCQB:BYAGF) is pleased to announce an updated Mineral Resource Estimate (the "MRE" or the "Mineral Resource") prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101, Standards for Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101") for the Hyland Project ("Hyland" or the "Project"),  Yukon, Canada, an additional property to Banyan's flagship Aurmac  Property as defined below in "about Banyan". ?The updated MRE  incorporates all drilling completed through 2018 and reflects the most  current information available, as no further drilling has been completed  since then.
  The updated MRE comprises an Indicated Mineral Resource of 337 thousand ("k") ?ounces ("oz") of gold ("Au") and 2.63 million ("M") oz of silver ("Ag") (11.3 M tonnes of ore at 0.93 g/t Au and 7.27 g/t Ag), and an Inferred Mineral Resource of 118k oz of Au and 0.86M oz Ag (3.9 M tonnes of ore at 0.95 g/t Au and 6.94 g/t Ag)(as defined in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum ("CIM")  Definition ?Standards for Mineral Resources & Mineral Reserves  incorporated by reference into NI 43-101). The updated MRE is summarized  below in Table 1; cut-off grade sensitivities for the Hyland deposit are presented in Table 2. The  Hyland Project pit-constrained MRE is contained in a single  near/on-surface deposit. The deposit is accessible by float plane and by  ground via a winter road from Watson Lake with substantial drill and  heavy equipment on site (Figure 1).
  "The updated, pit-constrained  Mineral Resource demonstrates the potential of the Hyland Project as a  gold and silver project. Mineralization is still open along strike to  the north and south as well as at depth. With additional work, there is  potential to delineate additional mineral resources in the main zone, as  well as define new resources in other portions of the property," stated  Tara Christie, President and CEO. "Work will continue in the off-season  to update the geologic model and refine targeting at the highly  prospective Cuz and Montrose zones."
    Figure 1. Plan Map Showing the location of the Hyland Project, Yukon, Canada.             Table 1: Pit-Constrained Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources - Hyland Project
 
 Cut-off Grade (AuEq g/t)
 
  | Tonnes
 
  | Au
 
  | Ag
 
  | AuEq
 
  |  Grade (g/t)
 
  | Ozs
 
  | Grade (g/t)
 
  | Ozs
 
  | Grade (g/t)
 
  | Ozs
 
  |  Indicated
 
  |  0.5
 
  | 11,272,000
 
  | 0.93
 
  | 337,000
 
  | 7.27
 
  | 2,634,000
 
  | 1.02
 
  | 368,000
 
  |  Inferred
 
  |  0.5
 
  | 3,865,000
 
  | 0.95
 
  | 118,000
 
  | 6.94
 
  | 863,000
 
  | 1.03
 
  | 128,000
 
  |   Hyland Gold Project Main Zone Mineral Resource Estimate Notes:
 
 - The effective date of the Hyland Mineral Resource Estimate is September 1, 2025.
 
  - The  mineral resource was estimated by Allan Armitage, Ph.D., P.Geo. of SGS  Geological Services who is an independent Qualified Person as defined by  NI 43-101.
 
  - The classification of the current  Mineral Resource Estimate into Indicated and Inferred mineral resources  is consistent with current 2014 CIM Definition Standards - For Mineral  Resources and Mineral Reserves.
 
  - All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimateand numbers may not add due to rounding.
 
  - The  mineral resources are presented undiluted and in situ, constrained by a  continuous 3D wireframe model, and is considered to have reasonable  prospects for eventual economic extraction.
 
  - Mineral  resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated  economic viability. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of  confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must  not be converted to a Mineral Reserve.
 
  - The Hyland  mineral resource estimate is based on a validated database which  includes data from surface trenching, and surface diamond and RC  drilling completed between 1987 and 2018.
 
  - The MRE for Hyland is based on one three-dimensional ("3D") resource model representing the deposit.
 
  - Grades  for Au and Ag were estimated for each mineralization domain using 1.5  metre drill core and 2.0 metre channel composites assigned to that  domain. To generate grade within the blocks, the inverse distance cubed  (ID2) interpolation method was used. An average SG value of 3.04 was used for tonnage calculation.
 
  - Based  on the location, surface exposure, size, shape, general true thickness,  and orientation, it is envisioned that Hyland may be mined using  open-pit mining methods. In-pit mineral resources are reported at a base  case cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t AuEq. The in-pit resource grade blocks  are quantified above the base case cut-off grade, above the constraining  pit shell, below topography and within the constraining mineralized  domain (the constraining volume).
 
  - The pit  optimization and base-case cut-off grade consider a gold price of  $2,400/oz and a silver price of $28 /oz and considers a gold recovery of  92% and silver recovery of 70%. The pit optimization and base case  cut-off grade also considers a mining cost of US$2.40/t mined, pit slope  of 55° degrees, and processing, treatment, refining, G&A and  transportation cost of USD$19.50/t of mineralized material.
 
  - The  results from the pit optimization, using the pseudoflow optimization  method in Whittle 2022, are used solely for the purpose of testing the  "reasonable prospects for economic extraction" by an open pit and do not  represent an attempt to estimate mineral reserves. There are no mineral  reserves on the Project. The results are used simply as a guide to  assist in the preparation of a mineral resource statement and to select  an appropriate resource reporting cut-off grade. A Whittle pit shell at a  revenue factor of 1.00 was selected as the ultimate pit shell for the  purposes of the current MRE.
 
  - The estimate of  Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental,  permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing, or other  relevant issues.
 
   A NI 43-101 Technical Report  supporting the updated Mineral Resource has been filed on SEDAR+ at  www.sedarplus.ca on the same day as this release.? The pit outlines used  to constrain the MRE are shown in Figure 2.
  Hyland Deposit
  The  drill data for Hyland is comprised of 86 drill holes (18,505.40 m) and  39 trenches (7,598.7 m). Completion of the current MRE also included an  updated three-dimensional (3D) mineral resource model (resource domain;  Figure 2).
    Figure  2: Plan View distribution of surface drill holes and channels/trenches  at the Main Zone of Hyland in relation to the mineralized model shape  (pink). Mineralization is open along strike both North and South and at  depth.             Mineralization  at Hyland occurs in a slightly recumbent anticline developed along a  regional structural corridor known as the Quartz Lake Lineament which is  cut by southeast-trending faults. Gold and silver occur in quartz veins  and breccias in quartzite, silicified zones in phyllite, and iron  sulphide and/or iron carbonate replacements zones in limestone.
  Table 2. Pit-Constrained Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources at Various AuEq g/t Cut-off Grades - Hyland Deposit
 
 Cut-off Grade (AuEq g/t)
 
  | Tonnes
 
  | Au
 
  | Ag
 
  | AuEq
 
  |  Grade (g/t)
 
  | Ozs
 
  | Grade (g/t)
 
  | Ozs
 
  | Grade (g/t)
 
  | Ozs
 
  |  Indicated
 
  |  0.2
 
  | 16,840,000
 
  | 0.73
 
  | 395,000
 
  | 5.89
 
  | 3,188,000
 
  | 0.80
 
  | 432,000
 
  |  0.3
 
  | 15,397,000
 
  | 0.78
 
  | 385,000
 
  | 6.22
 
  | 3,081,000
 
  | 0.85
 
  | 420,000
 
  |  0.4
 
  | 13,321,000
 
  | 0.85
 
  | 364,000
 
  | 6.74
 
  | 2,885,000
 
  | 0.93
 
  | 397,000
 
  |  0.5
 
  | 11,272,000
 
  | 0.93
 
  | 337,000
 
  | 7.27
 
  | 2,634,000
 
  | 1.02
 
  | 368,000
 
  |  0.6
 
  | 9,234,000
 
  | 1.03
 
  | 305,000
 
  | 7.92
 
  | 2,352,000
 
  | 1.12
 
  | 333,000
 
  |  0.7
 
  | 7,411,000
 
  | 1.13
 
  | 270,000
 
  | 8.69
 
  | 2,072,000
 
  | 1.24
 
  | 294,000
 
  |  1.0
 
  | 4,254,000
 
  | 1.41
 
  | 192,000
 
  | 10.88
 
  | 1,488,000
 
  | 1.53
 
  | 210,000
 
  |  Inferred
 
  |  0.2
 
  | 4,866,000
 
  | 0.82
 
  | 128,000
 
  | 6.29
 
  | 985,000
 
  | 0.89
 
  | 139,000
 
  |  0.3
 
  | 4,488,000
 
  | 0.87
 
  | 125,000
 
  | 6.55
 
  | 944,000
 
  | 0.94
 
  | 136,000
 
  |  0.4
 
  | 4,166,000
 
  | 0.91
 
  | 122,000
 
  | 6.72
 
  | 900,000
 
  | 0.99
 
  | 133,000
 
  |  0.5
 
  | 3,865,000
 
  | 0.95
 
  | 118,000
 
  | 6.94
 
  | 863,000
 
  | 1.03
 
  | 128,000
 
  |  0.6
 
  | 3,159,000
 
  | 1.05
 
  | 107,000
 
  | 7.73
 
  | 786,000
 
  | 1.14
 
  | 116,000
 
  |  0.7
 
  | 2,594,000
 
  | 1.15
 
  | 96,000
 
  | 8.57
 
  | 715,000
 
  | 1.25
 
  | 104,000
 
  |  1.0
 
  | 1,565,000
 
  | 1.39
 
  | 70,000
 
  | 11.00
 
  | 554,000
 
  | 1.52
 
  | 77,000
 
  |   Notes to Table 2:
 
 - The effective date of the Hyland Mineral Resource Estimate is September 1, 2025.
 
  - The  mineral resource was estimated by Allan Armitage, Ph.D., P.Geo. of SGS  Geological Services and is an independent Qualified Person as defined by  NI 43-101.
 
  - The classification of the current  Mineral Resource Estimate into Indicated and Inferred mineral resources  is consistent with current 2014 CIM Definition Standards - For Mineral  Resources and Mineral Reserves.
 
  - All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate and numbers may not add due to rounding.
 
  - The  mineral resources are presented undiluted and in situ, constrained by a  continuous 3D wireframe model, and is considered to have reasonable  prospects for eventual economic extraction.
 
  - Mineral  resources which are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated  economic viability. An Inferred Mineral Resource has a lower level of  confidence than that applying to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must  not be converted to a Mineral Reserve.
 
  - The Hyland  mineral resource estimate is based on a validated database which  includes data from surface trenching, and surface diamond and RC  drilling completed between 1987 and 2018.
 
  - The MRE for Hyland is based on one three-dimensional ("3D") resource model representing the deposit.
 
  - Grades  for Au and Ag were estimated for each mineralization domain using 1.5  metre drill core and 2.0 metre channel composites assigned to that  domain. To generate grade within the blocks, the inverse distance cubed  (ID2) interpolation method was used. An average SG value of 3.04 was used for tonnage calculation.
 
  - Based  on the location, surface exposure, size, shape, general true thickness,  and orientation, it is envisioned that Hyland may be mined using  open-pit mining methods. In-pit mineral resources are reported at a base  case cut-off grade of 0.5 g/t AuEq. The in-pit resource grade blocks  are quantified above the base case cut-off grade, above the constraining  pit shell, below topography and within the constraining mineralized  domain (the constraining volume).
 
  - The pit  optimization and base-case cut-off grade consider a gold price of  $2,400/oz and a silver price of $28 /oz and considers a gold recovery of  92% and silver recovery of 70%. The pit optimization and base case  cut-off grade also considers a mining cost of US$2.40/t mined, pit slope  of 55° degrees, and processing, treatment, refining, G&A and  transportation cost of USD$19.50/t of mineralized material.
 
  - The  results from the pit optimization, using the pseudoflow optimization  method in Whittle 2022, are used solely for the purpose of testing the  "reasonable prospects for economic extraction" by an open pit and do not  represent an attempt to estimate mineral reserves. There are no mineral  reserves on the Project. The results are used simply as a guide to  assist in the preparation of a mineral resource statement and to select  an appropriate resource reporting cut-off grade. A Whittle pit shell at a  revenue factor of 1.00 was selected as the ultimate pit shell for the  purposes of the current MRE.
 
  - The  estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by  environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political,  marketing, or other relevant issues.
 
   Average width  of the drill core sample intervals is 1.51m; the average width of the  channel assay samples is 3.10m. A composite length of 1.50m and 2.00  metres was chosen for the drill core assay data and channel sample data,  respectively.
  No capping of high-grade composites was used in  this MRE. Analysis of the composite data indicates very few outliers  within the database. Analysis of the spatial location of these samples  and the sample values proximal to them led the independent QP to believe  that the high values were legitimate parts of the population and that  the impact of including these high composite values uncapped would be  negligible to the overall resource estimate.
  The estimation of gold grades into a block model was carried out with the inverse distance squared (ID2)  interpolation method on uncapped composites with the resultant block  model comprised of a block size of 5m (easting) x 5m (northing) x 5m  (elevation). Specific gravity was estimated was based on 76 mineralized  samples and 67 waste rock samples.
                   Figure  3: Isometric view looking East Northeast: Mineral Resource Block Grades  (upper) and Block Class (lower) for the Main Zone at Hyland.             Upcoming Events
 
 - New Orleans Investment Conference - November 2 to 5, 2025
 
 - Corporate Update and Breakfast - November 5, 7:15 AM CST
 
  
  - Deutsche Goldmesse Fall, Frankfurt - November 14 to 15, 2025
 
  - Yukon Geoscience Forum, Whitehorse - November 16 to 19, 2025
 
   Quality Assurance, Quality Control Measures and Data Verification
  The reported work was completed using industry standard procedures, including a quality assurance/quality control ("QA/QC")  program consisting of the insertion of certified reference materials,  field duplicates and coarse blanks into the sample stream and utilizing  certified independent analytical laboratories for all assays.  Additionally, historic QA/QC data and methodology on the Hyland Project  were reviewed and are summarized in the NI 43-101 Technical Report?.  Based on a review of all possible information, the author of the  Technical Report is of the opinion that the database is of sufficient  quality to be used for the current Indicated and Inferred MRE.
  A  robust system of standards, core duplicates and coarse blanks, was  implemented in all Banyan drilling programs and was monitored as  chemical assay data became available. All control samples were within  accuracy and precision thresholds required to meet data quality  standards. These control samples amounted to approximately 10% of all  samples submitted to analytical laboratories.
  All geological data in the MRE was reviewed and verified by SGS Canada Inc. - Geological Services ("SGS")  as being accurate to the extent possible and to the extent possible all  geological information was reviewed and confirmed. SGS made site visits  to the Hyland Project on October 12, 2011, September 19-20 2017 and  August 25-26, 2025 and observed Banyan's drilling and sampling  techniques, as well as viewed Hyland drill core. SGS confirms that the  assay sampling QA/QC protocols undertaken by Banyan provide adequate and  good verification of the data and believes the work to have been done  within the CIM guidelines.
  NI 43-101 Technical Report
  Additional  discussion and disclosure on the updated MRE, Hyland Mineral Resource  Model Data Verification, as well as on Project earn-in status,  underlying royalties and metallurgical test work completed by Banyan is  included in the NI 43-101 Technical Report which was filed on SEDAR+  with this release.
  Qualified Persons
  The  updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Hyland Project was prepared  by Allan Armitage, Ph.D., P.Geo., Technical Manager and Senior Resource  Geologist, SGS Canada Inc. - Geological Services, an independent "Qualified Person" as required by NI 43-101, who has reviewed and approved the contents of this release and has verified the data disclosed as it relates to the MRE.
  Duncan Mackay, M.Sc., P.Geo., is a "Qualified Person" as ?defined under National Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101"),  and has reviewed and approved the content of this news release in  respect of all disclosure other than the MRE.? Mr. Mackay is Vice  President Exploration for Banyan and has verified the data disclosed in  this news release, including the sampling, ??analytical and test data  underlying the information.
  Analytical Method
  All  drill core and trench samples collected from the Hyland Gold program  were analyzed at Bureau Veritas Minerals of Burnaby, B.C., utilizing the  four-acid digestion ICP-MS 35-element MA300 analytical package with  FA450 50-gram Fire Assay with AAS finish for gold on all samples. All  core samples were split on-site at Banyan's core processing facilities  at the Hyland Gold Project. Once split, half samples were placed back in  the core boxes with the other half of split samples sealed in poly bags  with one part of a three-part sample tag inserted within. All these  samples were delivered by Banyan personnel or a dedicated expediter to  the Bureau Veritas, Whitehorse preparatory laboratory where samples are  prepared and then shipped to Bureau Veritas's Analytical laboratory in  Burnaby, B.C., for pulverization and final chemical analysis. A robust  system of standards was implemented in the 2017 exploration drilling  program and was monitored as chemical assay data become available. A  more robust description of historic analytical procedures will be  included in the forthcoming Hyland NI 43-101 report to be filed on  SEDAR+.
  About Banyan
  Banyan's  primary asset, the AurMac Project is located in the Traditional  Territory of First Nation of Na-Cho Nyäk Dun, in Canada's Yukon  Territory. The current Mineral Resource Estimate ("MRE")  for the AurMac Project has an effective date of June 28, 2025 and  comprises an Indicated Mineral Resource of 2.274 million ?ounces of gold  ("Au") (112.5 M tonnes at 0.63 g/t) and an Inferred  Mineral Resource of 5.453 M oz of Au (280.6 M tonnes at 0.60 g/t )  (Table 3: as defined in the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and  Petroleum ("CIM") Definition ?Standards for Mineral  Resources & Mineral Reserves incorporated by reference into NI  43-101). The 303 square kilometres ("sq km") AurMac  Project lies 40 km from Mayo, Yukon. The AurMac Project is transected by  the main Yukon highway and benefits from a 3-phase powerline, existing  power station and cell phone coverage.
  Table 3: Pit-Constrained Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources - AurMac Project
 
 Deposit
 
  | Gold Cut-Off (g/t)
 
  | Tonnage (M Tonnes)
 
  | Average Gold Grade (g/t)
 
  | Contained Gold (Moz)
 
  |  Indicated MRE
 
  |  
 
  |  Airstrip
 
  | 0.30
 
  | 27.7
 
  | 0.69
 
  | 0.611
 
  |  Powerline
 
  | 0.30
 
  | 84.8
 
  | 0.61
 
  | 1.663
 
  |  Total Combined Indicated MRE
 
  | 0.30
 
  | 112.5
 
  | 0.63
 
  | 2.274
 
  |  Inferred MRE
 
  |  
 
  |  Airstrip
 
  | 0.30
 
  | 10.1
 
  | 0.75
 
  | 0.245
 
  |  Powerline
 
  | 0.30
 
  | 270.4
 
  | 0.60
 
  | 5.208
 
  |  Total Combined Inferred MRE
 
  | 0.30
 
  | 280.6
 
  | 0.60
 
  | 5.453
 
  |   Notes to Table 3:
 
 - The  effective date for the MRE is June 28, 2025 and was prepared by Marc  Jutras, P.Eng., M.A.Sc., Principal, Ginto Consulting Inc., an  independent "Qualified Person" within the meaning of NI 43-101.
 
  - Mineral  Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated  economic viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially  affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation,  sociopolitical, marketing, changes in global gold markets or other  relevant issues.
 
  - The CIM Definition Standards were  followed for classification of Mineral Resources. The quantity and grade  of reported Inferred Mineral Resources in this estimation are uncertain  in nature ?and there has been insufficient exploration to define these  Inferred Mineral Resources as an ?Indicated Mineral Resource.
 
  - Mineral  Resources are reported at a cut-off grade of 0.30 g/t gold for all  deposits, using a US$/CAN$ exchange rate of 0.73 and constrained within  an open pit shell optimized with the Lerchs-Grossman algorithm to  constrain the Mineral Resources with the following estimated parameters:  gold price of US$2,050/ounce, US$2.50/t mining cost, US$10.00/t  processing cost, US$2.00/t G+A, 90% gold recoveries, and 45° pit slopes.1
 
  - The  number of tonnes and ounces was rounded to the nearest thousand. Any  discrepancies in the totals are due to rounding effects.
 
   In  addition to the AurMac Project, the Company holds the Hyland Gold  Project, located 70 km Northeast of Watson Lake, Yukon, along the  Southeast end of the Tintina Gold Belt (the "Hyland Project")  in the Traditional Territory of the Kaska Nations, closest to the Liard  First Nation and Daylu Dena Council. The Hyland Project represents a  sediment hosted, structurally controlled, intrusion related gold  deposit, within a large land package (over 125 sq km), accessible by a  network of existing gravel access roads.
  Banyan also holds the  Nitra Gold Project, a grassroots exploration project located in the Mayo  Mining district, approximately 10 km west of the AurMac Gold property.  The Nitra Property lies in the northern part of the Selwyn basin and is  underlain by metaclastic rocks of the Late Proterozoic Yusezyu Formation  of the Hyland Group, similar to lithologies hosting portions of the  AurMac Project. Middle Cretaceous Tombstone Plutonic suite intrusions  occur along the property including the Morrison Creek and Minto Creek  stocks. The property is 100% owned and operated by Banyan Gold  Corporation ("Banyan") and covers approximately 313.9 sq km. The  property is accessible by road along the Silver Trail Highway, South  McQuesten Road and 4x4 roads.
  Banyan trades on the TSX-Venture Exchange under the symbol "BYN" and is quoted on the OTCQB Venture Market under the symbol "BYAGF". For more information, please visit the corporate website at or contact the Company.
  ON BEHALF OF BANYAN GOLD CORPORATION
  (signed) "Tara Christie" Tara Christie President & CEO
  For more information, please contact: Tara Christie • 778 928 0556 •  tchristie@banyangold.com Jasmine Sangria • 604 312 5610 •  jsangria@banyangold.com
  CAUTIONARY  STATEMENT: Neither the TSX Venture Exchange, its Regulation Services  Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture  Exchange) nor OTCQB Venture Market accepts responsibility for the  adequacy or accuracy of this release.
  No  stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has  approved or disapproved the information contained herein.
  FORWARD  LOOKING INFORMATION: This news release contains forward-looking  information, which is not comprised of historical facts and is based  upon the Company's current internal expectations, estimates,  projections, assumptions and beliefs. Such information can generally be  identified by the use of forwarding-looking wording such as "may",  "will", "expect", "estimate", "anticipate", "intend(s)", "believe",  "potential" and "continue" or the negative thereof or similar  variations. Forward-looking information involves risks, uncertainties  and other factors that could cause actual events, results, performance,  prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed or  implied by such forward-looking information. Forward looking  information in this news release includes, but is not limited to, the  Company's MRE in respect of the Project, plans for exploration; and  statements regarding exploration expectations, prospectivity of the  Company's property interests, potential mining processes, pricing  assumptions and costs ease and confidence in increasing ounces,  exploration or development plans and timelines; mineral resource  estimates; mineral recoveries and anticipated mining costs. Factors that  could cause actual results to differ materially from such  forward-looking information include uncertainties inherent in resource  estimates, continuity and extent of mineralization, capital and  operating costs varying significantly from estimates, the preliminary  nature of metallurgical test results, delays in obtaining or failures to  obtain required governmental, environmental or other project approvals,  political risks, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs  of financing needed in the future, changes in equity markets, inflation,  changes in exchange rates, fluctuations in commodity prices, and the  other risks involved in the mineral exploration and development  industry, enhanced risks inherent to conducting business in any  jurisdiction, timing and those risks set out in Banyan's public  documents filed on SEDAR. Although Banyan believes that the assumptions  and factors used in preparing the forward-looking information in this  news release are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on such  information, which only applies as of the date of this news release,  and no assurance can be given that such events will occur in the  disclosed time frames or at all. Banyan disclaims any intention or  obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether  as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than  as required by law.
  SOURCE: Banyan Gold Corp. |