SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : C-Cube
CUBE 35.58-2.0%Dec 9 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: BillyG who wrote (19337)7/24/1997 8:30:00 PM
From: John Rieman   of 50808
 
Todays IBD. MPEG LA...................

Can Patent Pool Promote Use Of Video Standard?
Date: 7/24/97
Author: Reinhardt Krause
Pay up. So says a group of companies claiming to hold key video compression patents.

They've created Denver-based MPEG Licensing Administrator LLC. It plans to collect royalties from makers of set-top TV boxes, digital video disc players, camcorders and high-definition TV gear.

The patents involve a video standard created by the Motion Picture Experts Group, or MPEG. Called MPEG-2, the standard sets video picture quality and determines how to transmit compressed video. For example, a set-top box using MPEG-2 chips would be assessed a $4 fee, the group says.

Who's in this elite group? Fujitsu Ltd. , General Instrument Corp., Lucent Technologies Inc., Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. , Mitsubishi Electric Corp. , Philips Electronics N.V., Scientific-Atlanta Inc., Sony Corp. and Columbia University.

Baryn Futa, MPEG Licensing Adminstrator's CEO, recently discussed the licensing with IBD.

IBD:

What precedent is there in the high-tech industry for this kind of patent pooling?

Futa:

I don't think there is one. I'm not aware of another entity that takes a cutting-edge standard like MPEG and organizes access to the intellectual property.

IBD:

MPEG Licensing Administrator's patent portfolio doesn't contain all the patents needed to comply with the MPEG-2 standard. Why should anyone go to you?

Futa:

If you're a manufacturer using MPEG-2 technology in the current marketplace, how do you start, where do you go? You could do a massive multimillion-dollar patent search and identify all the possible U.S. patents. Then you could pursue all those companies. We offer a list of patents that are all essential to MPEG-2. It quantifies your risk of exposure to a very reasonable number.

It's important to know that in our program the licensers are licensees. No one has enough coverage, enough patents, to not need this license.

IBD:

Why are you asking for royalties from the makers of end-products instead of chipmakers?

Futa:

The philosophy was to assess the royalty at the highest level of integration. That's where records are well-kept and where industries are accustomed to having licensing fees assessed.

IBD:

Is MPEG Licensing Administrator going to sue companies that don't get a license?

Futa:

Patent enforcement is a matter for the individual patent holders. The intention is not for us to be the MPEG police. The intent was to create one-stop shopping for a patent portfolio. If someone signs with us and breaches the contract, then we would enforce that.

IBD:

Would these royalties apply to products already sold?

Futa:

Yes. It goes (back) to June 1 of '94.

IBD:

How many licensees do you think MPEG Licensing Administrator will have a year or two from now?

Futa:

I expect hundreds of licensees, because of the nature of our program. It's the same licensing deal for everybody. There's no volume differentiation, and there's no up-front payment required.

IBD:

Are any companies with important MPEG patents not part of your licensing group?

Futa:

Thomson Consumer Electronics (a unit of Thomson-CSF of France) has told us that due to prior commitments it will be licensing its MPEG-2 patents through its GE/RCA licensing entity. Toshiba Corp. and Samsung Group have asked to join.

IBD:

How are you splitting the royalties among the group?

Futa:

Companies that wanted to work toward this goal submitted patents to us. We determined (how essential each) patent is to the MPEG-2 standard. The royalties are distributed . . . based on the number of essential patents (each member owns) and the country the patents are in. Sony has the most essential patents in the portfolio.

IBD:

What kind of royalty stream do you expect?

Futa:

It really depends on the marketplace development. From a financial point of view, the success of MPEG Licensing Administrator very much rides on the penetration curve of MPEG-2 products like DVDs and set-top boxes.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(C) Copyright 1997 Investors Business Daily, Inc.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext